Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

In+ersec+ion for Spatial People

OSGeo's Return on Equity

posted by Satri on Thursday September 06, @02:37PM   Printer-friendly   Email story  Permalink  Trackback URI  Slashdotthis  Diggthis  Del.icio.us
from the about-the-why-the-who-and-the-how dept.
The Open Source Geospatial Foundation discussion mailing list offered some great insights on the OSGeo and its return on equity. From the original message by Howard Butler: "Open source software works because people acting in their own self interest have the auxiliary benefit of helping everyone in the project. Report your pet bug, file a patch, add a new feature -- all of these things immediately help you, but ultimately help the project. This activity also imparts tangential benefits that are very hard to quantify but can be clearly important like personal visibility, credibility, and status. For an open source software project to be viable as a development entity, it must be able to bestow these benefits to its individual contributors. Everyone's reasons may be different, but people must be able to receive a return on their sweat equity that they put in or volunteer effort will not continue to flow into a project. I think that recognition and facilitation of this symbiosis is a blind spot for OSGeo. We should be striving to ensure that it can take place because we are a volunteer organization whose members have common goals. [...] Most of OSGeo's measurable successes to date have been volunteer efforts, not primarily financially-backed ones." The whole thread is worth reading to understand the potential future of the OSGeo.

Related Stories

First Anniversary of the Open Geospatial Foundation [+]
Tyler Mitchell, OSGeo's Executive Director, announced the rather quiet first year anniversary of the Open Source Geospatial Foundation. The interesting blog entry summarize what that year has been all about. From the entry's introduction: "February 4th, 2007 was the first anniversary of OSGeo. One year ago 25 people met face-to-face, and many more via phone and IRC, to discuss the possibility of starting an umbrella organisation. These participants represented over 13 different open source projects. The foundational purpose of the organisation was to help promote and continue to develop open source tools in the geospatial sphere. Since that time, much has happened and momentum around OSGeo continues to develop. Here are only a few highlights from that first year."
Open Source Geospatial Foundation Service Provider Directory Launched 1 comment [+]
The OSGeo discuss mailing list announced the new Service Provider Directory for OSGeo open source geospatial software service providers. From the announcement: "We (OSGeo WebCom) are finally bringing the Service Provider Directory online. It is essentially a web list of consultants, service organizations in the open source geospatial realm. We are currently seeking consultants and service organizations to register themselves in the directory. In a few weeks, assuming this goes fairly well, we will start trying to publicise the directory to potential clients, and work it into our "VisCom Messaging" at conferences and so forth."
OSGeo Updates 1 comment [+]
The OSGeo blog shares updates on their blog, first topic is the financial and fundraising issues, then recent membership elections and membership management and finally a reminder on the OSGeo Journal and the upcoming FOSS4G conference. From the first link: "We've never had any real commitment to revenue targets - how many donors, how much from grants, who is responsible for doing it all, etc. - so it is hard to show that we have a plan for meeting our budget expenditures. Autodesk is still committed to helping fund the start-up of OSGeo in the short term but to be truly sustainable we must augment that with additional funds. [...] I have spoken to several members who have grant-writing experience and I believe we have some great opportunities out there - especially for developing educational material and developing/delivering workshops across many domains." See also related stories below.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.