Slashgeo Log In
Google's StreetView Imagery Removing Process
posted by Satri
on Monday June 18, @11:08AM
Permalink
Trackback URI
Slashdotthis
Diggthis
Del.icio.us
from the can-you-stop-watching-me-please? dept.
from the can-you-stop-watching-me-please? dept.
Google's recent StreetView feature generated a lot of ink lately. All Points Blog links to a Wired article describing how people can indicate Google to remove imagery where they can be seen. From the article: "Google has blinked, backing down from its demand for my driver's license and a sworn statement and agreeing not to use the information I submit for any purpose other than processing my request." Google product counsel Daphne Keller personally phoned Bankston to tell him about the change in policy, and then Google's help desk sent him the new requirements: [...] (1) Your name (2) The location of the image in our service [...] That means Google has no content-based standard for a take-down, and no verification that the requester is the person pictured."
Related Stories
Google Launches Street View and Mapplets at Where 2.0 2007 9 comments
[+]
Slashdot discuss the Google announcement of their new Street View and Mapplets feature. Their summary: "Today at the O'Reilly Where 2.0 Conference Google unveiled two new map features. An O'Reilly blogger describes Street View, which uses 360-degree street-level video from Immersive Media to enable neighborhood walk-throughs in (for now) a few selected areas. The other new feature is Mapplets, which let you embed Google Maps mashups in any Web page. Much more coverage is linked from TechMeme." The GEB covers the launch. Of course, you can read about it from the Official Google Lat Long Blog. See related stories below.
Google Street View Could Be Unlawful In Europe? 7 comments
[+]
Slashdot discuss a story named Google StreetView could be unlawful in Europe. Their summary: "European data protection laws restrict the commercial use of photographs where individuals are identifiable. The law sets extra requirements for so-called sensitive personal data: it demands explicit consent, not just notification: 'If Google's multi-lens camera cars come to Europe and inadvertently find themselves taking pictures of persons leaving a church or sexual health clinic, they may just need to pull over and start picking up signatures."" See this previous story comments on privacy.
Google Street View Cars Ready To Rumble 2 comments
[+]
tprinty writes "Looks like Google is getting their street view fleet in order big time. A tipster to Gizmodo took some screenshots of a dozen Chevy Cobalts ready to hit the streets. Smile! Your on Google Maps!" From the Gizmodo article (with screenshot): "It was an entire fleet of at least 30 brand-new Chevy Cobalt cars parked behind the building, most without license plates yet. As you can see in the pictures above, each had a metal device attached to its top, which looks suspiciously like a vertical extension for mounting Google's Streetview 360° camera."
Technology: Google Street a Slice of Dystopian Future?
[+]
Slashdot discuss a short CNET entry wondering if Google StreetView is good or bad from a social point of view. Their summary: "According to a recent CNET article, Google Street View 'is just wrong'. The short piece which makes up part of a larger feature about 'technology that's just wrong' goes on to explain that Google Street View is like a scene from George Orwell's terrifying dystopian vision of 1984 and that it could ultimately change our behaviour because we'll never know when we're being watched. 'Google? Aren't they the friendly folk who help me find Web sites, cheat at pub quizzes, and look at porn? Yes, but since 2006 they're also photographing the streets of selected world cities and posting the results online for all to see. It was Jeremy Bentham who developed the idea of the Panopticon, a system of prison design whereby everybody could be seen from one central point, with the upshot being that prisoners learnt to modulate their behaviour — because they never knew if they were being watched. And that doesn't sound like much fun, does it?'"
Some related stories copied below.
Google Pulls StreetView Images Per U.S. Government
[+]
From the All Points Blog : "We have been contacted by the military," Google spokesman Larry Yu said. "In those instances where they (the U.S military) have expressed concerns about the imagery, we have accommodated their requests."...
The images that worry the Pentagon include views of bases, including security at the entrances to those installations.
"It actually shows where all the guards are. It shows how the barriers go up and down. It shows how to get in and out of buildings," said Renuart, commander of U.S. Northern Command.
For more information and a link to the original article, please visit the All Points Blog.
Update: 03/07 21:51 GMT by S :Slashdot users also discuss the issue. I dare remind our users that anyone can Google to remove specific StreetView imagery.
For more information and a link to the original article, please visit the All Points Blog.
Update: 03/07 21:51 GMT by S :Slashdot users also discuss the issue. I dare remind our users that anyone can Google to remove specific StreetView imagery.
Google Pulls StreetView Imagery In Response To Military Request
[+]
Google has pulled StreetView images showing military bases, at the request of the U.S. Military.
See the All Points Blog story for more information.
See the All Points Blog story for more information.
Technology: MapJack vs Google StreetView
[+]
Mapperz runs a comparison of MapJack vs Google StreetView. From the entry: "Well who wins?
In this case, it's unfair to say either is a clear winner, Mapperz prefers MapJack's 'User Interface' has more functions more interaction on the surroundings, while the might of Google tries to map and photograph every square inch of every US City (and told not to in places) they do have more coverage.
But MapJack wins on being the first location outside of the US (Chiang Mia, Thailand)."
Disclaimer: MapJack is a Slashgeo.org donor.
StreetView Face Blurring 2 comments
[+]
The What is special about geospatial blog reports about this new Google endeavor. From their summary : Google has recently updated their StreetView data in Manhatten. Biside some improvemetns in image quality, Google has implemented some automatic face-blurring technology. Form the screenshot you can see that it does work really nice. It blurs the faces, but doesn’t detract too much from the imagery.
For a more detailed explanation of why this is occurring, please visit the blog link above.
For a more detailed explanation of why this is occurring, please visit the blog link above.
Street View Catches House On Fire
[+]
I saw a link via the %scratchworkspace% blog which eventually leads to this article on the Valleywag blog which has an interesting twist to the Google Street View privacy issue. From the Valleywag article : "Google Street View's picture of a burning house on Eagle Point Drive in Sherwood, Arkansas, went viral over the weekend, prompting the solicitous censors of Mountain View to remove a 360-degree chunk of imagery from Google Maps. Google can erase the picture, but it can't erase this fact: The Google Street View car making the rounds in the neighborhood that day kept driving past the burning home, taking its assigned pictures. All of these images, like the one above, remain visible in Google Maps."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Google's StreetView Imagery Removing Process
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 1 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.





Privacy roundup
(Score:2)( http://alexandreleroux.blogspot.com/ | Last Journal: Friday March 17, @05:07PM )